SKILL.md
Team Composition Patterns
Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature.
When to Use This Skill
- Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task
- Choosing between preset team configurations
- Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role
- Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process)
- Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows
Team Sizing Heuristics
Complexity
Team Size
When to Use
Simple
1-2
Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature
Moderate
2-3
Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features
Complex
3-4
Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging
Very Complex
4-5
Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues
Rule of thumb: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead.
Preset Team Compositions
Review Team
- Size: 3 reviewers
- Agents: 3x
team-reviewer
- Default dimensions: security, performance, architecture
- Use when: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment
Debug Team
- Size: 3 investigators
- Agents: 3x
team-debugger
- Default hypotheses: 3 competing hypotheses
- Use when: Bug has multiple plausible root causes
Feature Team
- Size: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers)
- Agents: 1x
team-lead+ 2xteam-implementer
- Use when: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams
Fullstack Team
- Size: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers)
- Agents: 1x
team-lead+ 1x frontendteam-implementer+ 1x backendteam-implementer+ 1x testteam-implementer
- Use when: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers
Research Team
- Size: 3 researchers
- Agents: 3x
general-purpose
- Default areas: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic
- Capabilities: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch)
- Use when: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel
Security Team
- Size: 4 reviewers
- Agents: 4x
team-reviewer
- Default dimensions: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration
- Use when: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces
Migration Team
- Size: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer)
- Agents: 1x
team-lead+ 2xteam-implementer+ 1xteam-reviewer
- Use when: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification
Agent Type Selection
When spawning teammates with the Agent tool, choose subagent_type based on what tools the teammate needs:
Agent Type
Tools Available
Use For
general-purpose
All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.)
Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes
Explore
Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob)
Research, code exploration, analysis
Plan
Read-only tools
Architecture planning, task decomposition
agent-teams:team-reviewer
Read/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessage
Code review with structured findings
agent-teams:team-debugger
Read/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessage
Hypothesis-driven investigation
agent-teams:team-implementer
Read/Write/Edit/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessage
Building features within file ownership boundaries
agent-teams:team-lead
Read/search/Bash plus Agent Teams coordination tools
Team orchestration and coordination
Key distinction: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents.
Display Mode Configuration
Configure in ~/.claude/settings.json:
{
"teammateMode": "tmux"
}
Mode
Behavior
Best For
"tmux"
Each teammate in a tmux pane
Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents
"iterm2"
Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab
macOS users who prefer iTerm2
"in-process"
All teammates in same process
Simple tasks, CI/CD environments
Custom Team Guidelines
When building custom teams:
- Every team needs a coordinator — Either designate a
team-leador have the user coordinate directly
- Match roles to agent types — Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available
- Avoid duplicate roles — Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources
- Define boundaries upfront — Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities
- Keep it small — 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead
Troubleshooting
**A teammate was spawned as Explore but needs to write files.**
Explore and Plan are read-only agents. Change the subagent_type to general-purpose or an appropriate specialized agent type. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents.
The team is growing too large and coordination is slowing everything down.
Each additional teammate adds communication overhead. Consolidate roles: can one agent cover two dimensions? A 4-person team doing 6 independent tasks is usually better served by 3 agents covering 2 tasks each.
tmux mode is not showing panes.
Ensure tmux is installed and a session is already running before spawning teammates. The in-process mode works without tmux and is suitable for CI or scripted environments.
Two reviewers are flagging the same issues.
The review dimensions overlap. Redefine each reviewer's focus area: one on correctness/logic, one on security, one on performance/scalability. Overlapping coverage wastes tokens and produces duplicate findings.
**A team-lead is spawning teammates but they are not receiving tasks.**
Verify that the lead is using the Agent tool to spawn teammates and passing complete context in the prompt. Teammates start fresh with no prior conversation history — they need all relevant information in their initial prompt.
Related Skills
- parallel-feature-development — Decompose work streams and assign file ownership once the team is composed
- team-communication-protocols — Establish messaging norms and shutdown procedures for the assembled team