python-patterns

Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, and project structure decisions for Python development. Covers framework selection (FastAPI, Django, Flask) with decision trees based on project type, async requirements, and team context Teaches async vs sync decision-making for I/O-bound and CPU-bound workloads, with library recommendations for common async operations Includes type hint strategy, Pydantic validation patterns, and project structure templates from simple scripts to large applications Provides FastAPI and Django-specific principles including dependency injection, async views, ORM optimization, and background task selection Emphasizes context-driven decision-making over pattern memorization, with anti-patterns and a pre-implementation checklist

INSTALLATION
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill python-patterns
Run in your project or agent environment. Adjust flags if your CLI version differs.

SKILL.md

Python Patterns

Python development principles and decision-making for 2025.

Learn to THINK, not memorize patterns.

When to Use

Use this skill when making Python architecture decisions, choosing frameworks, designing async patterns, or structuring Python projects.

⚠️ How to Use This Skill

This skill teaches decision-making principles, not fixed code to copy.

  • ASK user for framework preference when unclear
  • Choose async vs sync based on CONTEXT
  • Don't default to same framework every time

1. Framework Selection (2025)

Decision Tree

What are you building?

│

├── API-first / Microservices

│   └── FastAPI (async, modern, fast)

│

├── Full-stack web / CMS / Admin

│   └── Django (batteries-included)

│

├── Simple / Script / Learning

│   └── Flask (minimal, flexible)

│

├── AI/ML API serving

│   └── FastAPI (Pydantic, async, uvicorn)

│

└── Background workers

    └── Celery + any framework

Comparison Principles

Factor

FastAPI

Django

Flask

Best for

APIs, microservices

Full-stack, CMS

Simple, learning

Async

Native

Django 5.0+

Via extensions

Admin

Manual

Built-in

Via extensions

ORM

Choose your own

Django ORM

Choose your own

Learning curve

Low

Medium

Low

Selection Questions to Ask:

  • Is this API-only or full-stack?
  • Need admin interface?
  • Team familiar with async?
  • Existing infrastructure?

2. Async vs Sync Decision

When to Use Async

async def is better when:

├── I/O-bound operations (database, HTTP, file)

├── Many concurrent connections

├── Real-time features

├── Microservices communication

└── FastAPI/Starlette/Django ASGI

def (sync) is better when:

├── CPU-bound operations

├── Simple scripts

├── Legacy codebase

├── Team unfamiliar with async

└── Blocking libraries (no async version)

The Golden Rule

I/O-bound → async (waiting for external)

CPU-bound → sync + multiprocessing (computing)

Don't:

├── Mix sync and async carelessly

├── Use sync libraries in async code

└── Force async for CPU work

Async Library Selection

Need

Async Library

HTTP client

httpx

PostgreSQL

asyncpg

Redis

aioredis / redis-py async

File I/O

aiofiles

Database ORM

SQLAlchemy 2.0 async, Tortoise

3. Type Hints Strategy

When to Type

Always type:

├── Function parameters

├── Return types

├── Class attributes

├── Public APIs

Can skip:

├── Local variables (let inference work)

├── One-off scripts

├── Tests (usually)

Common Type Patterns

# These are patterns, understand them:

# Optional → might be None

from typing import Optional

def find_user(id: int) -> Optional[User]: ...

# Union → one of multiple types

def process(data: str | dict) -> None: ...

# Generic collections

def get_items() -> list[Item]: ...

def get_mapping() -> dict[str, int]: ...

# Callable

from typing import Callable

def apply(fn: Callable[[int], str]) -> str: ...

Pydantic for Validation

When to use Pydantic:

├── API request/response models

├── Configuration/settings

├── Data validation

├── Serialization

Benefits:

├── Runtime validation

├── Auto-generated JSON schema

├── Works with FastAPI natively

└── Clear error messages

4. Project Structure Principles

Structure Selection

Small project / Script:

├── main.py

├── utils.py

└── requirements.txt

Medium API:

├── app/

│   ├── __init__.py

│   ├── main.py

│   ├── models/

│   ├── routes/

│   ├── services/

│   └── schemas/

├── tests/

└── pyproject.toml

Large application:

├── src/

│   └── myapp/

│       ├── core/

│       ├── api/

│       ├── services/

│       ├── models/

│       └── ...

├── tests/

└── pyproject.toml

FastAPI Structure Principles

Organize by feature or layer:

By layer:

├── routes/ (API endpoints)

├── services/ (business logic)

├── models/ (database models)

├── schemas/ (Pydantic models)

└── dependencies/ (shared deps)

By feature:

├── users/

│   ├── routes.py

│   ├── service.py

│   └── schemas.py

└── products/

    └── ...

5. Django Principles (2025)

Django Async (Django 5.0+)

Django supports async:

├── Async views

├── Async middleware

├── Async ORM (limited)

└── ASGI deployment

When to use async in Django:

├── External API calls

├── WebSocket (Channels)

├── High-concurrency views

└── Background task triggering

Django Best Practices

Model design:

├── Fat models, thin views

├── Use managers for common queries

├── Abstract base classes for shared fields

Views:

├── Class-based for complex CRUD

├── Function-based for simple endpoints

├── Use viewsets with DRF

Queries:

├── select_related() for FKs

├── prefetch_related() for M2M

├── Avoid N+1 queries

└── Use .only() for specific fields

6. FastAPI Principles

async def vs def in FastAPI

Use async def when:

├── Using async database drivers

├── Making async HTTP calls

├── I/O-bound operations

└── Want to handle concurrency

Use def when:

├── Blocking operations

├── Sync database drivers

├── CPU-bound work

└── FastAPI runs in threadpool automatically

Dependency Injection

Use dependencies for:

├── Database sessions

├── Current user / Auth

├── Configuration

├── Shared resources

Benefits:

├── Testability (mock dependencies)

├── Clean separation

├── Automatic cleanup (yield)

Pydantic v2 Integration

# FastAPI + Pydantic are tightly integrated:

# Request validation

@app.post("/users")

async def create(user: UserCreate) -> UserResponse:

    # user is already validated

    ...

# Response serialization

# Return type becomes response schema

7. Background Tasks

Selection Guide

Solution

Best For

BackgroundTasks

Simple, in-process tasks

Celery

Distributed, complex workflows

ARQ

Async, Redis-based

RQ

Simple Redis queue

Dramatiq

Actor-based, simpler than Celery

When to Use Each

FastAPI BackgroundTasks:

├── Quick operations

├── No persistence needed

├── Fire-and-forget

└── Same process

Celery/ARQ:

├── Long-running tasks

├── Need retry logic

├── Distributed workers

├── Persistent queue

└── Complex workflows

8. Error Handling Principles

Exception Strategy

In FastAPI:

├── Create custom exception classes

├── Register exception handlers

├── Return consistent error format

└── Log without exposing internals

Pattern:

├── Raise domain exceptions in services

├── Catch and transform in handlers

└── Client gets clean error response

Error Response Philosophy

Include:

├── Error code (programmatic)

├── Message (human readable)

├── Details (field-level when applicable)

└── NOT stack traces (security)

9. Testing Principles

Testing Strategy

Type

Purpose

Tools

Unit

Business logic

pytest

Integration

API endpoints

pytest + httpx/TestClient

E2E

Full workflows

pytest + DB

Async Testing

# Use pytest-asyncio for async tests

import pytest

from httpx import AsyncClient

@pytest.mark.asyncio

async def test_endpoint():

    async with AsyncClient(app=app, base_url="http://test") as client:

        response = await client.get("/users")

        assert response.status_code == 200

Fixtures Strategy

Common fixtures:

├── db_session → Database connection

├── client → Test client

├── authenticated_user → User with token

└── sample_data → Test data setup

10. Decision Checklist

Before implementing:

  • Asked user about framework preference?
  • Chosen framework for THIS context? (not just default)
  • Decided async vs sync?
  • Planned type hint strategy?
  • Defined project structure?
  • Planned error handling?
  • Considered background tasks?

11. Anti-Patterns to Avoid

❌ DON'T:

  • Default to Django for simple APIs (FastAPI may be better)
  • Use sync libraries in async code
  • Skip type hints for public APIs
  • Put business logic in routes/views
  • Ignore N+1 queries
  • Mix async and sync carelessly

✅ DO:

  • Choose framework based on context
  • Ask about async requirements
  • Use Pydantic for validation
  • Separate concerns (routes → services → repos)
  • Test critical paths

Remember: Python patterns are about decision-making for YOUR specific context. Don't copy code—think about what serves your application best.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
BrowserAct

Let your agent run on any real-world website

Bypass CAPTCHA & anti-bot for free. Start local, scale to cloud.

Explore BrowserAct Skills →

Stop writing automation&scrapers

Install the CLI. Run your first Skill in 30 seconds. Scale when you're ready.

Start free
free · no credit card