graphql

GraphQL schema design, resolver patterns, and production safety best practices. Covers nine core capabilities including schema design, resolvers, federation, subscriptions, DataLoader, code generation, and Apollo tooling for both server and client Emphasizes critical production hazards: N+1 query problems, unlimited query depth leading to DoS, introspection exposure, and improper authorization scoping Provides patterns for type-safe schemas with intentional nullability, batch query optimization via DataLoader, and normalized client-side caching Includes sharp-edge guidance on field-level authorization, query cost analysis, and subscription lifecycle management

INSTALLATION
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill graphql
Run in your project or agent environment. Adjust flags if your CLI version differs.

SKILL.md

GraphQL

GraphQL gives clients exactly the data they need - no more, no less. One

endpoint, typed schema, introspection. But the flexibility that makes it

powerful also makes it dangerous. Without proper controls, clients can

craft queries that bring down your server.

This skill covers schema design, resolvers, DataLoader for N+1 prevention,

federation for microservices, and client integration with Apollo/urql.

Key insight: GraphQL is a contract. The schema is the API documentation.

Design it carefully.

2025 lesson: GraphQL isn't always the answer. For simple CRUD, REST is

simpler. For high-performance public APIs, REST with caching wins. Use

GraphQL when you have complex data relationships and diverse client needs.

Principles

  • Schema-first design - the schema is the contract
  • Prevent N+1 queries with DataLoader
  • Limit query depth and complexity
  • Use fragments for reusable selections
  • Mutations should be specific, not generic update operations
  • Errors are data - use union types for expected failures
  • Nullability is meaningful - design it intentionally

Capabilities

  • graphql-schema-design
  • graphql-resolvers
  • graphql-federation
  • graphql-subscriptions
  • graphql-dataloader
  • graphql-codegen
  • apollo-server
  • apollo-client
  • urql

Scope

  • database-queries -> postgres-wizard
  • authentication -> authentication-oauth
  • rest-api-design -> backend
  • websocket-infrastructure -> backend

Tooling

Server

  • @apollo/server - When: Apollo Server v4 Note: Most popular GraphQL server
  • graphql-yoga - When: Lightweight alternative Note: Good for serverless
  • mercurius - When: Fastify integration Note: Fast, uses JIT

Client

  • @apollo/client - When: Full-featured client Note: Caching, state management
  • urql - When: Lightweight alternative Note: Smaller, simpler
  • graphql-request - When: Simple requests Note: Minimal, no caching

Tools

  • graphql-codegen - When: Type generation Note: Essential for TypeScript
  • dataloader - When: N+1 prevention Note: Batches and caches

Patterns

Schema Design

Type-safe schema with proper nullability

When to use: Designing any GraphQL API

SCHEMA DESIGN:

"""

The schema is your API contract. Design nullability

intentionally - non-null fields must always resolve.

"""

type Query {

Non-null - will always return user or throw

user(id: ID!): User!

Nullable - returns null if not found

userByEmail(email: String!): User

Non-null list with non-null items

users(limit: Int = 10, offset: Int = 0): [User!]!

Search with pagination

searchUsers(

query: String!

first: Int

after: String

): UserConnection!

}

type Mutation {

Input types for complex mutations

createUser(input: CreateUserInput!): CreateUserPayload!

updateUser(id: ID!, input: UpdateUserInput!): UpdateUserPayload!

deleteUser(id: ID!): DeleteUserPayload!

}

type Subscription {

userCreated: User!

messageReceived(roomId: ID!): Message!

}

Input types

input CreateUserInput {

email: String!

name: String!

role: Role = USER

}

input UpdateUserInput {

email: String

name: String

role: Role

}

Payload types (for errors as data)

type CreateUserPayload {

user: User

errors: [Error!]!

}

union UpdateUserPayload = UpdateUserSuccess | NotFoundError | ValidationError

type UpdateUserSuccess {

user: User!

}

Enums

enum Role {

USER

ADMIN

MODERATOR

}

Types with relationships

type User {

id: ID!

email: String!

name: String!

role: Role!

posts(limit: Int = 10): [Post!]!

createdAt: DateTime!

}

type Post {

id: ID!

title: String!

content: String!

author: User!

comments: [Comment!]!

published: Boolean!

}

Pagination (Relay-style)

type UserConnection {

edges: [UserEdge!]!

pageInfo: PageInfo!

totalCount: Int!

}

type UserEdge {

node: User!

cursor: String!

}

type PageInfo {

hasNextPage: Boolean!

hasPreviousPage: Boolean!

startCursor: String

endCursor: String

}

DataLoader for N+1 Prevention

Batch and cache database queries

When to use: Resolving relationships

DATALOADER:

"""

Without DataLoader, fetching 10 posts with authors

makes 11 queries (1 for posts + 10 for each author).

DataLoader batches into 2 queries.

"""

import DataLoader from 'dataloader';

// Create loaders per request

function createLoaders(db) {

return {

userLoader: new DataLoader(async (ids) => {

// Single query for all users

const users = await db.user.findMany({

where: { id: { in: ids } }

});

// Return in same order as ids

  const userMap = new Map(users.map(u => [u.id, u]));

  return ids.map(id => userMap.get(id) || null);

}),

postsByAuthorLoader: new DataLoader(async (authorIds) => {

  const posts = await db.post.findMany({

    where: { authorId: { in: authorIds } }

  });

  // Group by author

  const postsByAuthor = new Map();

  posts.forEach(post => {

    const existing = postsByAuthor.get(post.authorId) || [];

    postsByAuthor.set(post.authorId, [...existing, post]);

  });

  return authorIds.map(id => postsByAuthor.get(id) || []);

})

};

}

// Attach to context

const server = new ApolloServer({

typeDefs,

resolvers,

});

app.use('/graphql', expressMiddleware(server, {

context: async ({ req }) => ({

db,

loaders: createLoaders(db),

user: req.user

})

}));

// Use in resolvers

const resolvers = {

Post: {

author: (post, _, { loaders }) => {

return loaders.userLoader.load(post.authorId);

}

},

User: {

posts: (user, _, { loaders }) => {

return loaders.postsByAuthorLoader.load(user.id);

}

}

};

Apollo Client Caching

Normalized cache with type policies

When to use: Client-side data management

APOLLO CLIENT CACHING:

"""

Apollo Client normalizes responses into a flat cache.

Configure type policies for custom cache behavior.

"""

import { ApolloClient, InMemoryCache } from '@apollo/client';

const cache = new InMemoryCache({

typePolicies: {

Query: {

fields: {

// Paginated field

users: {

keyArgs: ['query'], // Cache separately per query

merge(existing = { edges: [] }, incoming, { args }) {

// Append for infinite scroll

if (args?.after) {

return {

...incoming,

edges: [...existing.edges, ...incoming.edges]

};

}

return incoming;

}

}

}

},

User: {

keyFields: ['id'], // How to identify users

fields: {

fullName: {

read(_, { readField }) {

// Computed field

return ${readField('firstName')} ${readField('lastName')};

}

}

}

}

}

});

const client = new ApolloClient({

uri: '/graphql',

cache,

defaultOptions: {

watchQuery: {

fetchPolicy: 'cache-and-network'

}

}

});

// Queries with hooks

import { useQuery, useMutation } from '@apollo/client';

const GET_USER = gql query GetUser($id: ID!) { user(id: $id) { id name email } };

function UserProfile({ userId }) {

const { data, loading, error } = useQuery(GET_USER, {

variables: { id: userId }

});

if (loading) return ;

if (error) return ;

return {data.user.name};

}

// Mutations with cache updates

const CREATE_USER = gql mutation CreateUser($input: CreateUserInput!) { createUser(input: $input) { user { id name email } errors { field message } } };

function CreateUserForm() {

const [createUser, { loading }] = useMutation(CREATE_USER, {

update(cache, { data: { createUser } }) {

// Update cache after mutation

if (createUser.user) {

cache.modify({

fields: {

users(existing = []) {

const newRef = cache.writeFragment({

data: createUser.user,

fragment: gql fragment NewUser on User { id name email }

});

return [...existing, newRef];

}

}

});

}

}

});

}

Code Generation

Type-safe operations from schema

When to use: TypeScript projects

GRAPHQL CODEGEN:

"""

Generate TypeScript types from your schema and operations.

No more manually typing query responses.

"""

Install

npm install -D @graphql-codegen/cli

npm install -D @graphql-codegen/typescript

npm install -D @graphql-codegen/typescript-operations

npm install -D @graphql-codegen/typescript-react-apollo

codegen.ts

import type { CodegenConfig } from '@graphql-codegen/cli';

const config: CodegenConfig = {

schema: 'http://localhost:4000/graphql',

documents: ['src//.graphql', 'src//.tsx'],

generates: {

'./src/generated/graphql.ts': {

plugins: [

'typescript',

'typescript-operations',

'typescript-react-apollo'

],

config: {

withHooks: true,

withComponent: false

}

}

}

};

export default config;

Run generation

npx graphql-codegen

Usage - fully typed!

import { useGetUserQuery, useCreateUserMutation } from './generated/graphql';

function UserProfile({ userId }: { userId: string }) {

const { data, loading } = useGetUserQuery({

variables: { id: userId } // Type-checked!

});

// data.user is fully typed

return {data?.user?.name};

}

Error Handling with Unions

Expected errors as data, not exceptions

When to use: Operations that can fail in expected ways

ERRORS AS DATA:

"""

Use union types for expected failure cases.

GraphQL errors are for unexpected failures.

"""

Schema

type Mutation {

login(email: String!, password: String!): LoginResult!

}

union LoginResult = LoginSuccess | InvalidCredentials | AccountLocked

type LoginSuccess {

user: User!

token: String!

}

type InvalidCredentials {

message: String!

}

type AccountLocked {

message: String!

unlockAt: DateTime

}

Resolver

const resolvers = {

Mutation: {

login: async (_, { email, password }, { db }) => {

const user = await db.user.findByEmail(email);

if (!user || !await verifyPassword(password, user.hash)) {

    return {

      __typename: 'InvalidCredentials',

      message: 'Invalid email or password'

    };

  }

  if (user.lockedUntil && user.lockedUntil > new Date()) {

    return {

      __typename: 'AccountLocked',

      message: 'Account temporarily locked',

      unlockAt: user.lockedUntil

    };

  }

  return {

    __typename: 'LoginSuccess',

    user,

    token: generateToken(user)

  };

}

},

LoginResult: {

__resolveType(obj) {

return obj.__typename;

}

}

};

Client query

const LOGIN = gql mutation Login($email: String!, $password: String!) { login(email: $email, password: $password) { ... on LoginSuccess { user { id name } token } ... on InvalidCredentials { message } ... on AccountLocked { message unlockAt } } };

// Handle all cases

const result = data.login;

switch (result.__typename) {

case 'LoginSuccess':

setToken(result.token);

redirect('/dashboard');

break;

case 'InvalidCredentials':

setError(result.message);

break;

case 'AccountLocked':

setError(${result.message}. Try again at ${result.unlockAt});

break;

}

Sharp Edges

Each resolver makes separate database queries

Severity: CRITICAL

Situation: You write resolvers that fetch data individually. A query for

10 posts with authors makes 11 database queries. For 100 posts,

that's 101 queries. Response time becomes seconds.

Symptoms:

  • Slow API responses
  • Many similar database queries in logs
  • Performance degrades with list size

Why this breaks:

GraphQL resolvers run independently. Without batching, the author

resolver runs separately for each post. The database gets hammered

with repeated similar queries.

Recommended fix:

USE DATALOADER

import DataLoader from 'dataloader';

// Create loader per request

const userLoader = new DataLoader(async (ids) => {

const users = await db.user.findMany({

where: { id: { in: ids } }

});

// IMPORTANT: Return in same order as input ids

const userMap = new Map(users.map(u => [u.id, u]));

return ids.map(id => userMap.get(id));

});

// Use in resolver

const resolvers = {

Post: {

author: (post, _, { loaders }) =>

loaders.userLoader.load(post.authorId)

}

};

Key points:

1. Create new loaders per request (for caching scope)

2. Return results in same order as input IDs

3. Handle missing items (return null, not skip)

Deeply nested queries can DoS your server

Severity: CRITICAL

Situation: Your schema has circular relationships (user.posts.author.posts...).

A client sends a query 20 levels deep. Your server tries to resolve

it and either times out or crashes.

Symptoms:

  • Server timeouts on certain queries
  • Memory exhaustion
  • Slow response for nested queries

Why this breaks:

GraphQL allows clients to request any valid query shape. Without

limits, a malicious or buggy client can craft queries that require

exponential work. Even legitimate queries can accidentally be too deep.

Recommended fix:

LIMIT QUERY DEPTH AND COMPLEXITY

import depthLimit from 'graphql-depth-limit';

import { createComplexityLimitRule } from 'graphql-validation-complexity';

const server = new ApolloServer({

typeDefs,

resolvers,

validationRules: [

// Limit nesting depth

depthLimit(10),

// Limit query complexity

createComplexityLimitRule(1000, {

  scalarCost: 1,

  objectCost: 2,

  listFactor: 10

})

]

});

Also consider:

- Query timeout limits

- Rate limiting per client

- Persisted queries (only allow pre-registered queries)

Introspection enabled in production exposes your schema

Severity: HIGH

Situation: You deploy to production with introspection enabled. Anyone can

query your schema, discover all types, mutations, and field names.

Attackers know exactly what to target.

Symptoms:

  • Schema visible via introspection query
  • GraphQL Playground accessible in production
  • Full type information exposed

Why this breaks:

Introspection is essential for development and tooling, but in

production it's a roadmap for attackers. They can find admin

mutations, internal fields, and deprecated but still working APIs.

Recommended fix:

DISABLE INTROSPECTION IN PRODUCTION

const server = new ApolloServer({

typeDefs,

resolvers,

introspection: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production',

plugins: [

process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production'

? ApolloServerPluginLandingPageDisabled()

: ApolloServerPluginLandingPageLocalDefault()

]

});

Better: Use persisted queries

Only allow pre-registered queries in production

const server = new ApolloServer({

typeDefs,

resolvers,

persistedQueries: {

cache: new InMemoryLRUCache()

}

});

Authorization only in schema directives, not resolvers

Severity: HIGH

Situation: You rely entirely on @auth directives for authorization. Someone

finds a way around the directive, or complex business rules don't

fit in a simple directive. Authorization fails.

Symptoms:

  • Unauthorized access to data
  • Business rules not enforced
  • Directive-only security bypassed

Why this breaks:

Directives are good for simple checks but can't handle complex

business logic. "User can edit their own posts, or any post in

groups they moderate" doesn't fit in a directive.

Recommended fix:

AUTHORIZE IN RESOLVERS

// Simple check in resolver

Mutation: {

deletePost: async (_, { id }, { user, db }) => {

if (!user) {

throw new AuthenticationError('Must be logged in');

}

const post = await db.post.findUnique({ where: { id } });

if (!post) {

  throw new NotFoundError('Post not found');

}

// Business logic authorization

const canDelete =

  post.authorId === user.id ||

  user.role === 'ADMIN' ||

  await userModeratesGroup(user.id, post.groupId);

if (!canDelete) {

  throw new ForbiddenError('Cannot delete this post');

}

return db.post.delete({ where: { id } });

}

}

// Helper for field-level authorization

User: {

email: (user, _, { currentUser }) => {

// Only show email to self or admin

if (currentUser?.id === user.id || currentUser?.role === 'ADMIN') {

return user.email;

}

return null;

}

}

Authorization on queries but not on fields

Severity: HIGH

Situation: You check if a user can access a resource, but not individual

fields. User A can see User B's public profile, and accidentally

also sees their private email and phone number.

Symptoms:

  • Sensitive data exposed
  • Privacy violations
  • Field data visible to wrong users

Why this breaks:

Field resolvers run after the parent is returned. If the parent

query returns a user, all fields are resolved - including sensitive

ones. Each sensitive field needs its own auth check.

Recommended fix:

FIELD-LEVEL AUTHORIZATION

const resolvers = {

User: {

// Public fields - no check needed

id: (user) => user.id,

name: (user) => user.name,

// Private fields - check access

email: (user, _, { currentUser }) => {

  if (!currentUser) return null;

  if (currentUser.id === user.id) return user.email;

  if (currentUser.role === 'ADMIN') return user.email;

  return null;

},

phoneNumber: (user, _, { currentUser }) => {

  if (currentUser?.id !== user.id) return null;

  return user.phoneNumber;

},

// Or throw instead of returning null

privateData: (user, _, { currentUser }) => {

  if (currentUser?.id !== user.id) {

    throw new ForbiddenError('Not authorized');

  }

  return user.privateData;

}

}

};

Non-null field failure nullifies entire parent

Severity: MEDIUM

Situation: You make fields non-null for convenience. A resolver throws or

returns null. The error propagates up, nullifying parent objects,

until the whole query response is null or errors out.

Symptoms:

  • Queries return null unexpectedly
  • One error affects unrelated fields
  • Partial data can't be returned

Why this breaks:

GraphQL's null propagation means if a non-null field can't resolve,

its parent becomes null. If that parent is also non-null, it

propagates further. One failing field can break an entire response.

Recommended fix:

DESIGN NULLABILITY INTENTIONALLY

WRONG: Everything non-null

type User {

id: ID!

name: String!

email: String!

avatar: String! # What if no avatar?

lastLogin: DateTime! # What if never logged in?

}

RIGHT: Nullable where appropriate

type User {

id: ID! # Always exists

name: String! # Required field

email: String! # Required field

avatar: String # Optional - may not exist

lastLogin: DateTime # Nullable - may be null

}

For lists:

[User!]! - Non-null list of non-null users (recommended)

[User!] - Nullable list of non-null users

[User]! - Non-null list of nullable users (rarely useful)

[User] - Nullable list of nullable users (avoid)

Rule of thumb:

- Non-null if always present and failure should fail query

- Nullable if optional or failure shouldn't break response

Expensive queries treated same as cheap ones

Severity: MEDIUM

Situation: Every query is processed the same. A simple user(id) query uses

the same resources as users(first: 1000) { posts { comments } }.

Expensive queries starve out cheap ones.

Symptoms:

  • Expensive queries slow everything
  • No way to prioritize queries
  • Rate limiting is ineffective

Why this breaks:

Not all GraphQL operations are equal. Fetching 1000 users with

nested data is orders of magnitude more expensive than fetching

one user. Without cost analysis, you can't rate limit properly.

Recommended fix:

QUERY COST ANALYSIS

import { createComplexityLimitRule } from 'graphql-validation-complexity';

// Define complexity per field

const complexityRules = createComplexityLimitRule(1000, {

scalarCost: 1,

objectCost: 10,

listFactor: 10,

// Custom field costs

fieldCost: {

'Query.searchUsers': 100,

'Query.analytics': 500,

'User.posts': ({ args }) => args.limit || 10

}

});

// For rate limiting by cost

const costPlugin = {

requestDidStart() {

return {

didResolveOperation({ request, document }) {

const cost = calculateQueryCost(document);

if (cost > 1000) {

throw new Error(Query too expensive: ${cost});

}

// Track cost for rate limiting

rateLimiter.consume(request.userId, cost);

}

};

}

};

Subscriptions not properly cleaned up

Severity: MEDIUM

Situation: Clients subscribe but don't unsubscribe cleanly. Network issues

leave orphaned subscriptions. Server memory grows as dead

subscriptions accumulate.

Symptoms:

  • Memory usage grows over time
  • Dead connections accumulate
  • Server slows down

Why this breaks:

Each subscription holds server resources. Without proper cleanup

on disconnect, resources accumulate. Long-running servers

eventually run out of memory.

Recommended fix:

PROPER SUBSCRIPTION CLEANUP

import { PubSub, withFilter } from 'graphql-subscriptions';

import { WebSocketServer } from 'ws';

import { useServer } from 'graphql-ws/lib/use/ws';

const pubsub = new PubSub();

// Track active subscriptions

const activeSubscriptions = new Map();

const wsServer = new WebSocketServer({

server: httpServer,

path: '/graphql'

});

useServer({

schema,

context: (ctx) => ({

pubsub,

userId: ctx.connectionParams?.userId

}),

onConnect: (ctx) => {

console.log('Client connected');

},

onDisconnect: (ctx) => {

// Clean up resources for this connection

const userId = ctx.connectionParams?.userId;

activeSubscriptions.delete(userId);

}

}, wsServer);

// Subscription resolver with cleanup

Subscription: {

messageReceived: {

subscribe: withFilter(

(_, { roomId }, { pubsub, userId }) => {

// Track subscription

activeSubscriptions.set(userId, roomId);

return pubsub.asyncIterator(ROOM_${roomId});

},

(payload, { roomId }) => {

return payload.roomId === roomId;

}

)

}

}

Validation Checks

Introspection enabled in production

Severity: WARNING

Message: Introspection should be disabled in production

Fix action: Set introspection: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production'

Direct database query in resolver

Severity: WARNING

Message: Consider using DataLoader to batch and cache queries

Fix action: Create DataLoader and use .load() instead of direct query

No query depth limiting

Severity: WARNING

Message: Consider adding depth limiting to prevent DoS

Fix action: Add validationRules: [depthLimit(10)]

Resolver without try-catch

Severity: INFO

Message: Consider wrapping resolver logic in try-catch

Fix action: Add error handling to provide better error messages

JSON or Any type in schema

Severity: INFO

Message: Avoid JSON/Any types - they bypass GraphQL's type safety

Fix action: Define proper input/output types

Mutation returns bare type instead of payload

Severity: INFO

Message: Consider using payload types for mutations (includes errors)

Fix action: Create CreateUserPayload type with user and errors fields

List field without pagination arguments

Severity: INFO

Message: List fields should have pagination (limit, first, after)

Fix action: Add arguments: field(limit: Int, offset: Int): [Type!]!

Query hook without error handling

Severity: INFO

Message: Handle query errors in UI

Fix action: Destructure and handle error: const { error } = useQuery(...)

Using refetch instead of cache update

Severity: INFO

Message: Consider cache update instead of refetch for better UX

Fix action: Use update function to modify cache directly

Collaboration

Delegation Triggers

  • user needs database optimization -> postgres-wizard (Optimize queries for GraphQL resolvers)
  • user needs authentication system -> authentication-oauth (Auth for GraphQL context)
  • user needs caching layer -> caching-strategies (Response caching, DataLoader caching)
  • user needs real-time infrastructure -> backend (WebSocket setup for subscriptions)

Related Skills

Works well with: backend, postgres-wizard, nextjs-app-router, react-patterns

When to Use

  • User mentions or implies: graphql
  • User mentions or implies: graphql schema
  • User mentions or implies: graphql resolver
  • User mentions or implies: apollo server
  • User mentions or implies: apollo client
  • User mentions or implies: graphql federation
  • User mentions or implies: dataloader
  • User mentions or implies: graphql codegen
  • User mentions or implies: graphql query
  • User mentions or implies: graphql mutation

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
BrowserAct

Let your agent run on any real-world website

Bypass CAPTCHA & anti-bot for free. Start local, scale to cloud.

Explore BrowserAct Skills →

Stop writing automation&scrapers

Install the CLI. Run your first Skill in 30 seconds. Scale when you're ready.

Start free
free · no credit card