SKILL.md
E2E Behavior Validation for Frontend Modifications
Core Principle: Test Product Behavior, Not UI States
CRITICAL: Tests must verify that product features WORK correctly, not just that UI elements render.
What NOT to test (UI States):
- ❌ "Dropdown opens when clicked"
- ❌ "Modal appears after button click"
- ❌ "Loading spinner shows during request"
- ❌ "Form fields are visible"
- ❌ "Sidebar collapses"
What TO test (Product Behavior):
- ✅ "Selecting an LLM provider configures the agent to use that provider"
- ✅ "Creating a new agent persists it and shows in the agents list"
- ✅ "Running a tool with parameters returns the expected output"
- ✅ "Chat messages stream correctly and maintain conversation context"
- ✅ "Workflow execution triggers tools in the correct order"
Prerequisites
Requires Playwright MCP server. If the browser_navigate tool is unavailable, instruct the user to add it:
claude mcp add playwright -- npx @playwright/mcp@latest
Step 1: Understand the Feature Intent
Before writing ANY test, answer these questions:
- What user problem does this feature solve?
- What is the expected outcome when the feature works correctly?
- What data flows through the system? (user input → API → state → UI)
- What should persist after page reload?
- What downstream effects should this action have?
Document these answers as comments in your test file.
Step 2: Build and Start
pnpm build:cli
cd packages/playground/e2e/kitchen-sink && pnpm dev
Verify server at http://localhost:4111
Step 3: Map Feature to Behavior Tests
Feature-to-Test Mapping Guide
Feature Category
What to Test
Example Assertion
Agent Configuration
Config changes affect agent behavior
Send message → verify response uses selected model
LLM Provider Selection
Selected provider is used in requests
Intercept API call → verify provider in request payload
Tool Execution
Tool runs with correct params & returns result
Execute tool → verify output matches expected transformation
Workflow Execution
Steps execute in order, data flows between steps
Run workflow → verify each step's output feeds next step
Chat/Streaming
Messages persist, context maintained across turns
Multi-turn conversation → verify context awareness
MCP Server Tools
Server tools are callable and return data
Call MCP tool → verify response structure and content
Memory/Persistence
Data survives page reload
Create item → reload → verify item exists
Error Handling
Errors surface correctly to user
Trigger error condition → verify error message + recovery
Step 4: Write Behavior-Focused Tests
Test Structure Template
import { test, expect, Page } from '@playwright/test';
import { resetStorage } from '../__utils__/reset-storage';
import { selectFixture } from '../__utils__/select-fixture';
import { nanoid } from 'nanoid';
/**
* FEATURE: [Name of feature]
* USER STORY: As a user, I want to [action] so that [outcome]
* BEHAVIOR UNDER TEST: [Specific behavior being validated]
*/
test.describe('[Feature Name] - Behavior Tests', () => {
let page: Page;
test.beforeEach(async ({ browser }) => {
const context = await browser.newContext();
page = await context.newPage();
});
test.afterEach(async () => {
await resetStorage(page);
});
test('should [verb describing behavior] when [trigger condition]', async () => {
// ARRANGE: Set up preconditions
// - Navigate to the feature
// - Configure any required state
// ACT: Perform the user action that triggers the behavior
// ASSERT: Verify the OUTCOME, not the UI state
// - Check data persistence
// - Verify downstream effects
// - Confirm API calls made correctly
});
});
Behavior Test Patterns
#### Pattern 1: Configuration Affects Behavior
test('selecting LLM provider should use that provider for agent responses', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await page.goto('/agents/my-agent/chat');
// Intercept API to verify provider
let capturedProvider: string | null = null;
await page.route('**/api/chat', route => {
const body = JSON.parse(route.request().postData() || '{}');
capturedProvider = body.provider;
route.continue();
});
// ACT: Select a different provider
await page.getByTestId('provider-selector').click();
await page.getByRole('option', { name: 'OpenAI' }).click();
// Send a message to trigger the agent
await page.getByTestId('chat-input').fill('Hello');
await page.getByTestId('send-button').click();
// ASSERT: Verify the selected provider was used
await expect.poll(() => capturedProvider).toBe('openai');
});
#### Pattern 2: Data Persistence
test('created agent should persist after page reload', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await page.goto('/agents');
const agentName = `Test Agent ${nanoid()}`;
// ACT: Create new agent
await page.getByTestId('create-agent-button').click();
await page.getByTestId('agent-name-input').fill(agentName);
await page.getByTestId('save-agent-button').click();
// Wait for creation to complete
await expect(page.getByText(agentName)).toBeVisible();
// ASSERT: Verify persistence
await page.reload();
await expect(page.getByText(agentName)).toBeVisible({ timeout: 10000 });
});
#### Pattern 3: Tool Execution Produces Correct Output
test('weather tool should return formatted weather data', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await selectFixture(page, 'weather-success');
await page.goto('/tools/weather-tool');
// ACT: Execute tool with parameters
await page.getByTestId('param-city').fill('San Francisco');
await page.getByTestId('execute-tool-button').click();
// ASSERT: Verify OUTPUT content, not just that output appears
const output = page.getByTestId('tool-output');
await expect(output).toContainText('temperature');
await expect(output).toContainText('San Francisco');
// Verify structured data if applicable
const outputText = await output.textContent();
const outputData = JSON.parse(outputText || '{}');
expect(outputData).toHaveProperty('temperature');
expect(outputData).toHaveProperty('conditions');
});
#### Pattern 4: Workflow Step Chaining
test('workflow should pass data between steps correctly', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await selectFixture(page, 'workflow-multi-step');
const sessionId = nanoid();
await page.goto(`/workflows/data-pipeline?session=${sessionId}`);
// ACT: Trigger workflow execution
await page.getByTestId('workflow-input').fill('test input data');
await page.getByTestId('run-workflow-button').click();
// ASSERT: Verify each step received correct input from previous step
// Wait for completion
await expect(page.getByTestId('workflow-status')).toHaveText('completed', { timeout: 30000 });
// Check step outputs show data transformation chain
const step1Output = await page.getByTestId('step-1-output').textContent();
const step2Output = await page.getByTestId('step-2-output').textContent();
// Verify step 2 received step 1's output as input
expect(step2Output).toContain(step1Output);
});
#### Pattern 5: Streaming Chat with Context
test('chat should maintain conversation context across messages', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await selectFixture(page, 'contextual-chat');
const chatId = nanoid();
await page.goto(`/agents/assistant/chat/${chatId}`);
// ACT: Multi-turn conversation
await page.getByTestId('chat-input').fill('My name is Alice');
await page.getByTestId('send-button').click();
await expect(page.getByTestId('assistant-message').last()).toBeVisible({ timeout: 20000 });
await page.getByTestId('chat-input').fill('What is my name?');
await page.getByTestId('send-button').click();
// ASSERT: Verify context was maintained
const response = page.getByTestId('assistant-message').last();
await expect(response).toContainText('Alice', { timeout: 20000 });
});
#### Pattern 6: Error Recovery
test('should show actionable error and allow retry when API fails', async () => {
// ARRANGE: Set up failure fixture
await selectFixture(page, 'api-failure');
await page.goto('/tools/flaky-tool');
// ACT: Trigger the error
await page.getByTestId('execute-tool-button').click();
// ASSERT: Error is shown with recovery option
await expect(page.getByTestId('error-message')).toContainText('failed');
await expect(page.getByTestId('retry-button')).toBeVisible();
// Switch to success fixture and retry
await selectFixture(page, 'api-success');
await page.getByTestId('retry-button').click();
// Verify recovery worked
await expect(page.getByTestId('tool-output')).toBeVisible({ timeout: 10000 });
await expect(page.getByTestId('error-message')).not.toBeVisible();
});
Step 5: Update Existing Tests
When a test file already exists:
- Read the existing tests to understand current coverage
- Identify if tests are UI-focused or behavior-focused
- Refactor UI-focused tests to verify behavior instead:
Refactoring Example
BEFORE (UI-focused):
test('dropdown opens when clicked', async () => {
await page.getByTestId('model-dropdown').click();
await expect(page.getByRole('listbox')).toBeVisible();
});
AFTER (Behavior-focused):
test('selecting model from dropdown updates agent configuration', async () => {
// Open dropdown and select model
await page.getByTestId('model-dropdown').click();
await page.getByRole('option', { name: 'GPT-4' }).click();
// Verify the selection persists and affects behavior
await page.reload();
await expect(page.getByTestId('model-dropdown')).toHaveText('GPT-4');
// Optionally: verify the model is used in actual requests
// (via request interception or checking response metadata)
});
Step 6: Kitchen-Sink Fixtures for Behavior Testing
Fixtures should represent realistic scenarios, not just mock data:
Fixture Naming Convention
<feature>-<scenario>.fixture.ts
Examples:
- agent-with-tools.fixture.ts
- chat-multi-turn-context.fixture.ts
- workflow-parallel-execution.fixture.ts
- tool-validation-error.fixture.ts
- mcp-server-timeout.fixture.ts
Fixture Content Requirements
Each fixture must define:
- Scenario description (what behavior it enables testing)
- Expected outcomes (what assertions should pass)
- Edge cases covered (error states, empty states, etc.)
// fixtures/agent-provider-switch.fixture.ts
export const agentProviderSwitch = {
name: 'agent-provider-switch',
description: 'Tests that switching LLM providers changes agent behavior',
// Mock responses for different providers
responses: {
openai: { content: 'Response from OpenAI', model: 'gpt-4' },
anthropic: { content: 'Response from Anthropic', model: 'claude-3' },
},
expectedBehavior: {
// When provider is switched, subsequent messages use new provider
providerSwitchAffectsNextMessage: true,
// Provider selection persists across page reload
providerPersistsOnReload: true,
},
};
Step 7: Run and Validate
cd packages/playground && pnpm test:e2e
Test Quality Checklist
Before considering tests complete, verify:
- Each test has a clear user story comment
- Tests verify OUTCOMES, not intermediate UI states
- Tests would FAIL if the feature broke (not just if UI changed)
- Persistence is verified via
page.reload()where applicable
- Error scenarios are covered
- Tests use appropriate timeouts for async operations
- Fixtures represent realistic usage scenarios
Quick Reference
Step
Command/Action
Build
pnpm build:cli
Start
cd packages/playground/e2e/kitchen-sink && pnpm dev
App URL
Routes
@packages/playground/src/App.tsx
Run tests
cd packages/playground && pnpm test:e2e
Test dir
packages/playground/e2e/tests/
Fixtures
packages/playground/e2e/kitchen-sink/fixtures/
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
❌ Don't
✅ Do Instead
Test that modal opens
Test that modal action completes and persists
Test that button is clickable
Test that clicking button produces expected result
Test loading spinner appears
Test that loaded data is correct
Test form validation message shows
Test that invalid form cannot submit AND valid form succeeds
Test dropdown has options
Test that selecting option changes system behavior
Test sidebar navigation works
Test that navigated page has correct data/functionality
Assert element is visible
Assert element contains expected data/state