claude-md-improver

Audit and improve CLAUDE.md files to optimize Claude Code's project context. Discovers all CLAUDE.md variants (project root, local overrides, package-specific, global defaults) and evaluates each against a quality rubric covering commands, architecture clarity, patterns, conciseness, currency, and actionability Outputs a detailed quality report with file-by-file scores and specific improvement recommendations before making any changes Applies targeted, minimal updates only after user approval, preserving existing content and showing diffs for each addition Flags common issues like stale commands, missing dependencies, outdated architecture, and undocumented gotchas that impede future Claude sessions

INSTALLATION
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-official --skill claude-md-improver
Run in your project or agent environment. Adjust flags if your CLI version differs.

SKILL.md

$2a

Type

Location

Purpose

Project root

./CLAUDE.md

Primary project context (checked into git, shared with team)

Local overrides

./.claude.local.md

Personal/local settings (gitignored, not shared)

Global defaults

~/.claude/CLAUDE.md

User-wide defaults across all projects

Package-specific

./packages/*/CLAUDE.md

Module-level context in monorepos

Subdirectory

Any nested location

Feature/domain-specific context

Note: Claude auto-discovers CLAUDE.md files in parent directories, making monorepo setups work automatically.

Phase 2: Quality Assessment

For each CLAUDE.md file, evaluate against quality criteria. See references/quality-criteria.md for detailed rubrics.

Quick Assessment Checklist:

Criterion

Weight

Check

Commands/workflows documented

High

Are build/test/deploy commands present?

Architecture clarity

High

Can Claude understand the codebase structure?

Non-obvious patterns

Medium

Are gotchas and quirks documented?

Conciseness

Medium

No verbose explanations or obvious info?

Currency

High

Does it reflect current codebase state?

Actionability

High

Are instructions executable, not vague?

Quality Scores:

  • A (90-100): Comprehensive, current, actionable
  • B (70-89): Good coverage, minor gaps
  • C (50-69): Basic info, missing key sections
  • D (30-49): Sparse or outdated
  • F (0-29): Missing or severely outdated

Phase 3: Quality Report Output

ALWAYS output the quality report BEFORE making any updates.

Format:

## CLAUDE.md Quality Report

### Summary

- Files found: X

- Average score: X/100

- Files needing update: X

### File-by-File Assessment

#### 1. ./CLAUDE.md (Project Root)

**Score: XX/100 (Grade: X)**

| Criterion | Score | Notes |

|-----------|-------|-------|

| Commands/workflows | X/20 | ... |

| Architecture clarity | X/20 | ... |

| Non-obvious patterns | X/15 | ... |

| Conciseness | X/15 | ... |

| Currency | X/15 | ... |

| Actionability | X/15 | ... |

**Issues:**

- [List specific problems]

**Recommended additions:**

- [List what should be added]

#### 2. ./packages/api/CLAUDE.md (Package-specific)

...

Phase 4: Targeted Updates

After outputting the quality report, ask user for confirmation before updating.

Update Guidelines (Critical):

-

Propose targeted additions only - Focus on genuinely useful info:

  • Commands or workflows discovered during analysis
  • Gotchas or non-obvious patterns found in code
  • Package relationships that weren't clear
  • Testing approaches that work
  • Configuration quirks

-

Keep it minimal - Avoid:

  • Restating what's obvious from the code
  • Generic best practices already covered
  • One-off fixes unlikely to recur
  • Verbose explanations when a one-liner suffices

-

Show diffs - For each change, show:

  • Which CLAUDE.md file to update
  • The specific addition (as a diff or quoted block)
  • Brief explanation of why this helps future sessions

Diff Format:

### Update: ./CLAUDE.md

**Why:** Build command was missing, causing confusion about how to run the project.

+ ## Quick Start

+

+ bash

+ npm install

+ npm run dev # Start development server on port 3000

+

Phase 5: Apply Updates

After user approval, apply changes using the Edit tool. Preserve existing content structure.

Templates

See [references/templates.md](references/templates.md) for CLAUDE.md templates by project type.

Common Issues to Flag

  1. Stale commands: Build commands that no longer work
  1. Missing dependencies: Required tools not mentioned
  1. Outdated architecture: File structure that's changed
  1. Missing environment setup: Required env vars or config
  1. Broken test commands: Test scripts that have changed
  1. Undocumented gotchas: Non-obvious patterns not captured

User Tips to Share

When presenting recommendations, remind users:

  • **# key shortcut**: During a Claude session, press # to have Claude auto-incorporate learnings into CLAUDE.md
  • Keep it concise: CLAUDE.md should be human-readable; dense is better than verbose
  • Actionable commands: All documented commands should be copy-paste ready
  • **Use .claude.local.md**: For personal preferences not shared with team (add to .gitignore)
  • Global defaults: Put user-wide preferences in ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md

What Makes a Great CLAUDE.md

Key principles:

  • Concise and human-readable
  • Actionable commands that can be copy-pasted
  • Project-specific patterns, not generic advice
  • Non-obvious gotchas and warnings

Recommended sections (use only what's relevant):

  • Commands (build, test, dev, lint)
  • Architecture (directory structure)
  • Key Files (entry points, config)
  • Code Style (project conventions)
  • Environment (required vars, setup)
  • Testing (commands, patterns)
  • Gotchas (quirks, common mistakes)
  • Workflow (when to do what)
BrowserAct

Let your agent run on any real-world website

Bypass CAPTCHA & anti-bot for free. Start local, scale to cloud.

Explore BrowserAct Skills →

Stop writing automation&scrapers

Install the CLI. Run your first Skill in 30 seconds. Scale when you're ready.

Start free
free · no credit card