m07-concurrency

CRITICAL: Use for concurrency/async. Triggers: E0277 Send Sync, cannot be sent between threads, thread, spawn, channel, mpsc, Mutex, RwLock, Atomic, async,…

INSTALLATION
npx skills add https://github.com/actionbook/rust-skills --skill m07-concurrency
Run in your project or agent environment. Adjust flags if your CLI version differs.

SKILL.md

Concurrency

Layer 1: Language Mechanics

Core Question

Is this CPU-bound or I/O-bound, and what's the sharing model?

Before choosing concurrency primitives:

  • What's the workload type?
  • What data needs to be shared?
  • What's the thread safety requirement?

Error → Design Question

ErrorDon't Just SayAsk Instead
E0277 Send"Add Send bound"Should this type cross threads?
E0277 Sync"Wrap in Mutex"Is shared access really needed?
Future not Send"Use spawn_local"Is async the right choice?
Deadlock"Reorder locks"Is the locking design correct?

Thinking Prompt

Before adding concurrency:

-

What's the workload?

  • CPU-bound → threads (std::thread, rayon)
  • I/O-bound → async (tokio, async-std)
  • Mixed → hybrid approach

-

What's the sharing model?

  • No sharing → message passing (channels)
  • Immutable sharing → Arc
  • Mutable sharing → Arc<Mutex> or Arc<RwLock>

-

What are the Send/Sync requirements?

  • Cross-thread ownership → Send
  • Cross-thread references → Sync
  • Single-thread async → spawn_local

Trace Up ↑ (MANDATORY)

CRITICAL: Don't just fix the error. Trace UP to find domain constraints.

Domain Detection Table

Context KeywordsLoad Domain SkillKey Constraint
Web API, HTTP, axum, actix, handlerdomain-webHandlers run on any thread
交易, 支付, trading, paymentdomain-fintechAudit + thread safety
gRPC, kubernetes, microservicedomain-cloud-nativeDistributed tracing
CLI, terminal, clapdomain-cliUsually single-thread OK

Example: Web API + Rc Error

"Rc cannot be sent between threads" in Web API context

    ↑ DETECT: "Web API" → Load domain-web

    ↑ FIND: domain-web says "Shared state must be thread-safe"

    ↑ FIND: domain-web says "Rc in state" is Common Mistake

    ↓ DESIGN: Use Arc<T> with State extractor

    ↓ IMPL: axum::extract::State<Arc<AppConfig>>

Generic Trace

"Send not satisfied for my type"

    ↑ Ask: What domain is this? Load domain-* skill

    ↑ Ask: Does this type need to cross thread boundaries?

    ↑ Check: m09-domain (is the data model correct?)
SituationTrace ToQuestion
Send/Sync in Webdomain-webWhat's the state management pattern?
Send/Sync in CLIdomain-cliIs multi-thread really needed?
Mutex vs channelsm09-domainShared state or message passing?
Async vs threadsm10-performanceWhat's the workload profile?

Trace Down ↓

From design to implementation:

"Need parallelism for CPU work"

    ↓ Use: std::thread or rayon

"Need concurrency for I/O"

    ↓ Use: async/await with tokio

"Need to share immutable data across threads"

    ↓ Use: Arc<T>

"Need to share mutable data across threads"

    ↓ Use: Arc<Mutex<T>> or Arc<RwLock<T>>

    ↓ Or: channels for message passing

"Need simple atomic operations"

    ↓ Use: AtomicBool, AtomicUsize, etc.

Send/Sync Markers

MarkerMeaningExample
SendCan transfer ownership between threadsMost types
SyncCan share references between threadsArc
!SendMust stay on one threadRc
!SyncNo shared refs across threadsRefCell

Quick Reference

PatternThread-SafeBlockingUse When
std::threadYesYesCPU-bound parallelism
async/awaitYesNoI/O-bound concurrency
Mutex YesYesShared mutable state
RwLock YesYesRead-heavy shared state
mpsc::channelYesOptionalMessage passing
Arc >YesYesShared mutable across threads

Decision Flowchart

What type of work?

├─ CPU-bound → std::thread or rayon

├─ I/O-bound → async/await

└─ Mixed → hybrid (spawn_blocking)

Need to share data?

├─ No → message passing (channels)

├─ Immutable → Arc<T>

└─ Mutable →

   ├─ Read-heavy → Arc<RwLock<T>>

   └─ Write-heavy → Arc<Mutex<T>>

   └─ Simple counter → AtomicUsize

Async context?

├─ Type is Send → tokio::spawn

├─ Type is !Send → spawn_local

└─ Blocking code → spawn_blocking

Common Errors

ErrorCauseFix
E0277 Send not satisfiedNon-Send in asyncUse Arc or spawn_local
E0277 Sync not satisfiedNon-Sync sharedWrap with Mutex
DeadlockLock orderingConsistent lock order
future is not SendNon-Send across awaitDrop before await
MutexGuard across awaitGuard held during suspendScope guard properly

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy BadBetter
Arc everywhereContention, complexityMessage passing
thread::sleep in asyncBlocks executortokio::time::sleep
Holding locks across awaitBlocks other tasksScope locks tightly
Ignoring deadlock riskHard to debugLock ordering, try_lock

Async-Specific Patterns

Avoid MutexGuard Across Await

// Bad: guard held across await

let guard = mutex.lock().await;

do_async().await;  // guard still held!

// Good: scope the lock

{

    let guard = mutex.lock().await;

    // use guard

}  // guard dropped

do_async().await;

Non-Send Types in Async

// Rc is !Send, can't cross await in spawned task

// Option 1: use Arc instead

// Option 2: use spawn_local (single-thread runtime)

// Option 3: ensure Rc is dropped before .await

Related Skills

WhenSee
Smart pointer choicem02-resource
Interior mutabilitym03-mutability
Performance tuningm10-performance
Domain concurrency needsdomain-*
BrowserAct

Let your agent run on any real-world website

Bypass CAPTCHA & anti-bot for free. Start local, scale to cloud.

Explore BrowserAct Skills →

Stop writing automation&scrapers

Install the CLI. Run your first Skill in 30 seconds. Scale when you're ready.

Start free
free · no credit card